<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s China Move: Raises Search Engine Giant to Higher CSR Plane?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sdialogue.com/csr/googles-china-move-raises-search-engine-giant-to-higher-csr-plane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sdialogue.com/csr/googles-china-move-raises-search-engine-giant-to-higher-csr-plane/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:56:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://sdialogue.com/csr/googles-china-move-raises-search-engine-giant-to-higher-csr-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdialogue.com/?p=910#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Totally Agree with you David. Originally, we meant it to be a post on whether Google&#039;s move would even fall under the rubrick of CSR -- as you point out, time will give a better idea of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally Agree with you David. Originally, we meant it to be a post on whether Google&#8217;s move would even fall under the rubrick of CSR &#8212; as you point out, time will give a better idea of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Connor</title>
		<link>http://sdialogue.com/csr/googles-china-move-raises-search-engine-giant-to-higher-csr-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>David Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdialogue.com/?p=910#comment-65</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t judge an organisation on a single act, especially if that particular action is still being played out.

It is either a wonderfully Machiavellian tactic to improve market share in China, if they we&#039;re to go back in, and motivated by profit, but more likely a genuine adherence to ethical values that we tend to mistrust as a stranger in today&#039;s corporate world.

As the dust settles Google will have undoubtably improved their CSR reputation merely by presenting their case as a moral decision. They now have a rare oppportunity to further propel and reinforce this advantage by sustaining their approach to deliver tanible improvements toward internet censorship and control by Chinese government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t judge an organisation on a single act, especially if that particular action is still being played out.</p>
<p>It is either a wonderfully Machiavellian tactic to improve market share in China, if they we&#8217;re to go back in, and motivated by profit, but more likely a genuine adherence to ethical values that we tend to mistrust as a stranger in today&#8217;s corporate world.</p>
<p>As the dust settles Google will have undoubtably improved their CSR reputation merely by presenting their case as a moral decision. They now have a rare oppportunity to further propel and reinforce this advantage by sustaining their approach to deliver tanible improvements toward internet censorship and control by Chinese government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://sdialogue.com/csr/googles-china-move-raises-search-engine-giant-to-higher-csr-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdialogue.com/?p=910#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Good post, Arthur. For additional insights from today&#039;s activity, see:
NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/asia/21china.html?ref=global-home 
and
WSJ: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703699204575016993811178902.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Arthur. For additional insights from today&#8217;s activity, see:<br />
NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/asia/21china.html?ref=global-home" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/asia/21china.html?ref=global-home</a><br />
and<br />
WSJ: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703699204575016993811178902.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703699204575016993811178902.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

