Perry Goldschein - Sustainability Strategy, Communications & Marketing

Sign Up For
Conscious Clicks

Our free monthly newsletter for news, analysis and marketing tips!



Yes, I want to receive Conscious Clicks
> Privacy Policy

CONSCIOUS CLICKS - The Blog

News and analysis on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and Internet and other digital marketing and communications. You'll even get some very practical tips on these topics that you can put to immediate use!

February 28th, 2012

The New Rules of Green Marketing – 1st Anniversary Review

Its first anniversary seemed like an apropos time to review “The New Rules of Green Marketing” by Jacquie Ottman – something I’d been meaning to do for a while.

I was first impressed by Ms. Ottman’s work with the second edition of her first book, “Green Marketing”, published in 1998. It was truly a well-researched, well-written book by a leader in the field. Her New Rules outdoes her initial efforts, while also incorporating the events, trends and wisdom of the last decade in which sustainability has become mainstream and even business critical in many industries.

With extensive use of research-based statistics and numerous graphic illustrations, this bible of green marketing covers a lot of ground succinctly in a way businesses of any size can apply its teachings. The book is full of practical checklists at the end of each chapter, an extensive 25-page green marketing resource guide, and dozens of inspiring case studies of successful, greener products and companies.

The book also provides in-depth insights into the changing needs of mainstream consumers; how companies of all sizes have responded with fresh green marketing strategies, including a discussion of cause marketing and eco labels; what it takes to succeed; and what shape the future of marketing will take.

Ottman draws on a lot of data and incorporates lessons learned from the Fortune 500 and others, including Method, Timberland and Starbucks. She demonstrates how to: spur innovation through a proactive approach to sustainability; design products to be green throughout their lifecycle; and communicate credibly and transparently to avoid accusations of “greenwashing” and inspire stakeholders.

New Rules’ substantial coverage of topics across many categories includes whole-lifecycle processes such as energy and water used in manufacture and transportation, questions of end-of-life disposal, and many other issues necessary in creating and communicating about truly sustainable and responsible products and organizations. Helping engage customers around reducing waste and responsible consumption is a practice descirbed in the book that is starting to gain significant traction.

One of the book’s “seven strategies for green marketing success” is establishing “credibility for your efforts by communicating your corporate commitment and striving for complete transparency.” I agree completely with this, assuming there is a substantive corporate commitment to begin with, and where “complete transparency” relates to all that stakeholders need to know for informed decision-making.

One of the ways I would have loved to see the concepts of corporate commitment, credibility and transparency explored further was through a discussion of corporate-level (as opposed to brand level) efforts and communications, including the development and use of sustainability reports. Most of the Fortune 500, and hundreds if not thousands of others, now compile these reports, and the number is still growing. The report, when done properly, serves as both a strategic sustainability roadmap for the company and as the basis for an array of green marketing efforts. Ottman does make reference to them on page 138.

But this takes nothing away from how useful Ottman’s book is to green marketers at all levels. There is something new and useful for even the most seasoned green marketers, and New Rules should be on all marketers’ book shelves.

March 16th, 2011

4 Critical Q&As for Sustainability Branding

Sheila Viswanathan from GoodGuide made a nice blog post with four basic, yet critical questions for brands who have started down the path of greater sustainability. What follows is my answers to her questions in a comment on her blog post, which is pending approval as I post this.

The 1st Q: Do you think it’s better for brands to shout their sustainability from mountain tops, or just let products show for themselves?

My thoughts: First, brands engaged in substantive sustainability efforts should communicate about those efforts, at the very least to help educate consumers about relevant issues.

Second, such communications should be integrated and made a part of the brand so that they are authentic — that way, if a brand is known for shouting from mountain tops, shouting sustainability from those mountain tops will fit; if more reserved, likewise.  Starbucks, Timberland and Method are prime examples of brands doing this particularly well.

Third, brands increasingly need to find issues relevant to their industry and products where they can take a leadership position — this will be necessary to help them continue to use sustainability as a differentiator. Starbucks did this, for example, with its crowd sourcing “Betacup” campaign to help it find the best solution to those millions of unsustainable paper cups its coffee is served in every day.

The 2nd Q: If brands don’t “shout from mountaintops,” how will we know what good they’ve started to build into their operations?

My thoughts: we won’t know, unless we’re among those small few who go digging. However, each brand must determine how sustainability can best be integrated (see first part of my response to question above). I do think it will be beneficial to talk about it where possible for the vast majority of brands, as long as it’s in a credible and, yes, transparent way.

The 3rd Q: What about smaller brands that don’t have money to shout from mountaintops?

See the Gort Cloud by Richard Seireeni, which shows how smaller brands have been doing this even before social media. I’ve personally helped dozens of such brands with digital and other marketing tactics utilizing “NGOs, trendspotters, advocacy groups, social networks, business alliances, certifying organizations, and other members of the green community,” so I know Rich’s advice is sound.

The 4th Q:  What role do corporate sustainability reports play in all of this? Have you ever read one of these reports (or a summary of one)?

With sustainability / CSR reports becoming ever more common, they have a critical role in marketing communications beyond being a check box tactic. Smart companies are using their CSR reports as the strategic planning tools they are, and to have available for stakeholders that request them; but, critically, they’re breaking down the typically vast amounts of data and stories in their reports in digestible bits targeted to each stakeholder group. For the 90-some percent of consumers, employees, and investors who will never read a CSR report, this is very important. In most of these cases, this is done digitally/interactively.

October 7th, 2010

Will FTC’s Revised “Green Guides” Make Green Marketers Blue?

green-guidesWill green marketers be singing the blues following the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) long-awaited proposed revisions on Wednesday to its “Green Guides?” There’s no consensus on that, with initial comments ranging from little impact to predictions of wide-ranging changes, especially by lawyers. It will probably be somewhere in between. There was also concern expressed that what results from the Guides could end up confusing consumers even more.

Read the rest of this entry »

September 22nd, 2010

“Sustainable Products” to Get a Boost from the EPA

by Perry Goldschein

EPA Sustainable Products

Even as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced transition out of its popular Climate Leaders Program, it looked to get more involved with “sustainable products.”

EPA announced last week that it’s currently defining its role and developing a strategy to further the development, manufacture, designation, and use of sustainable products. Organizations impacted by this new EPA effort may include those that “manufacture, distribute, label, certify, verify, and purchase or use . . . products that may be considered as ‘green,’ ‘sustainable,’ or ‘environmentally preferable.’”

Read the rest of this entry »

September 14th, 2010

Integrate Corporate & Brand Sustainability Efforts for Greater Impact

By Beth Bengtson

As many of the Global 2000 companies kick their sustainability initiatives up a notch or two, we are consistently seeing a disconnect between these programs at the corporate and brand levels.  Much of the work being done at the corporate level is not effectively being shared and integrated into the relevant brands owned by a corporation; and vice versa, there are often cause-related campaigns, for example, occurring via a specific brand that do not get included in corporate communications around sustainability issues.

Read the rest of this entry »



RSS Subscribe to our Blog

Add to Technorati Favorites

Bookmark and Share

  • Blogroll

  • Archives

    Popular Tags

    Social Media