Perry Goldschein - Sustainability Strategy, Communications & Marketing

Sign Up For
Conscious Clicks

Our free monthly newsletter for news, analysis and marketing tips!



Yes, I want to receive Conscious Clicks
> Privacy Policy

CONSCIOUS CLICKS - The Blog

News and analysis on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and Internet and other digital marketing and communications. You'll even get some very practical tips on these topics that you can put to immediate use!

October 7th, 2010

Will FTC’s Revised “Green Guides” Make Green Marketers Blue?

green-guidesWill green marketers be singing the blues following the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) long-awaited proposed revisions on Wednesday to its “Green Guides?” There’s no consensus on that, with initial comments ranging from little impact to predictions of wide-ranging changes, especially by lawyers. It will probably be somewhere in between. There was also concern expressed that what results from the Guides could end up confusing consumers even more.

Read the rest of this entry »

September 22nd, 2010

“Sustainable Products” to Get a Boost from the EPA

by Perry Goldschein

EPA Sustainable Products

Even as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced transition out of its popular Climate Leaders Program, it looked to get more involved with “sustainable products.”

EPA announced last week that it’s currently defining its role and developing a strategy to further the development, manufacture, designation, and use of sustainable products. Organizations impacted by this new EPA effort may include those that “manufacture, distribute, label, certify, verify, and purchase or use . . . products that may be considered as ‘green,’ ‘sustainable,’ or ‘environmentally preferable.’”

Read the rest of this entry »

September 17th, 2009

Engaging Stakeholders on Sustainability

We attended Sustainability Stakeholder Engagement earlier this week, a two-day conference organized by GreenPower Conferences in New York.

Stakeholder engagement is a critical, yet often overlooked or under-prioritized aspect of many organizations’ sustainability efforts. The Sustainability Stakeholder Engagement (SSE) conference offered insights and practical ways to build effective relations with stakeholders, from customers, employees and investors, to suppliers, NGOs and communities. SSE gave considerable attention to social media, a topic near to our hearts (Beth is putting the final touches on a white paper on this subject to release next week). The panel on engaging consumers offered perhaps the most lively conversation with the audience.

Here are key lessons from the sessions we attended:

Stakeholder Engagement Overview Sessions

  • Engage stakeholders sooner, rather than later to develop a more material and effective strategy. Understanding their perspectives and issues can help shape a better approach for your organization from early on in the process.
  • Sustainability has become important to companies of all sizes, according to Tim Smith, SVP at Walden Asset Management, who surveyed small caps in his portfolio. They told him they  understand its importance, but aren’t quite sure how to engage in it.
  • Companies need an internal champion who aligns interests of high priority stakeholders with internal decision makers. “This is critical” said Alex McIntosh, director of Corporate Citizenship for Nestle Waters.
  • Internal education often takes more time than external engagement. Companies must continually identify and prioritize key internal stakeholders. Shoot for some “clear wins,” asking “How do I get my co on board?”
  • Engage even your most vocal critics to try to find common ground. They impact consumer and media perceptions and ultimately sales — positively or negatively.

Social Media & Sustainability Engagement Sessions

Even as the social media presentations were being made, a handful of attendees were Twittering live about them and the event from their laptops and handhelds – something commonplace at trade events these days. Other salient points include:

  • Social media is an increasingly important way to engage with stakeholders in a more timely manner. Representatives from EDF, SAP, Sprint, 2 Degrees and Max Gladwell spoke on the emergence of this technology.
  • Twitter is very useful for tying together, linking and promoting all communications, including corporate press materials, media articles, videos, photos, corporate blog posts and executive pod casts, according to Alex Hahn, CSR Communications Manager at Sprint.
  • “If you’re not on Twitter, you’re not able to tell your side of the story,” was a quote from Hahn which attendees tweeted, and which spread the most of all conference tweets elsewhere on Twitter on Monday.
  • Ensure there’s an adequate internal team to help keep content fresh and respond to others. “You can’t just drop the conversation once you begin,” said Martin Chilcott of 2degrees.
  • Be open and authentic in use of social media — ensure a “Spin Free Zone” — and stakeholders will trust you more and be more forgiving of mistakes.
  • Be OK with the occasional conflicts of message.
  • Use social media to talk about your sustainability efforts “like you’re on a journey,” advised Chilcott, indicating a level of transparency others find more engaging.

Consumer Engagement

  • Panelists agreed that consumers are confused about sustainability messages and that data standards are needed. Research found most consumers even believed they weren’t impacting the environment by buying green products, according to Chet Chaffee, VP at Scientific Certification Systems (SCS). This showed attendees that there is much work to be done in terms of guiding organizations and educating consumers.
  • Many are also skeptical of green claims due to greenwashing.
  • There was much discussion about Walmart’s Sustainability Index, Dianne Feinstein’s proposed federal eco label legislation, and what some states are doing to try to provide some clarity to the messaging. Panelists believed an index like Walmart’s could be a game changer to solve the problem of consumer confusion.
  • To build credibility and differentiate yourself among the green noise, put messaging in context, connecting the brand with mitigating the type of impact relevant to its product (e.g., creating a more fuel-efficient car); also by obtaining outside audits and relevant, respected certifications.  For example, EPA’s SmartWay label helped Sharp gain traction with Walmart, which boosted it to preferred vendor status, and helped its sales.

Internal, NGO and Community Engagement:

  • Employee engagement is critical to success, and employees need to be empowered. Just asking them to participate isn’t enough, make it easy for them to do so. There were various tactics presented from companies like Sharp and Deloitte. Discussion of incentives included giving a vacation day for a day of service, friendly competition across offices to see who can be the most green, and contests on sites like Justmeans. (http://www.justmeans.com/)
  • Face-to-face feedback is necessary, as email is not as effective to communicate with and recognize employee efforts.
  • Focus on developing relationships with the “adverse” stakeholders, as well as those that support your work. It’s much better to enter into dialogue with those opposed to you, even if you disagree. Don’t try to ignore or undermine their credibility.
  • Seventh Generation was cited as an example of a firm whose accumulated goodwill helped it resolve an issue with multiple NGOs before the issue even went public.
  • Many NGOs engage with large multinationals; those relationships shouldn’t constrain NGOs from dealing with such firms on local or regional issues as well as broad industry issues.

Corporate sector participants at SSE included representatives from Benjamin Moore, PepsiCo, SAP and Sprint, in addition to Deloitte, Nestle Waters N.A. and Sharp as noted above. Among NGOs, those attending included representatives from Environmental Defense Fund, Greenpeace and World Wildlife Fund. The audience size was modest, at fewer than 100 people, but most seemed to appreciate the intimacy that the small group allowed.

More information about the conference can be found on Twitter by doing a search on #sse09

July 9th, 2009

B Corp’s Legal “DNA” & Rating System

I enjoyed an inspiring presentation from Bart Houlahan, co-founder of B Corp, right here in the Hudson Valley yesterday, and speaking with him afterwards.

As a former lawyer, I love B Corp’s legal “DNA” approach and am impressed (like so many others, apparently) with the rating system B Corp’s developed. While I’d known about B Corp for a while, it was good to get the details from the horse’s mouth.

B Corp has over 4,000 registered users of its free online ratings system, including investors assessing potential private equity investments, and businesses assessing suppliers and even customers, in addition to those evaluating their own companies and membership in B Corp. There’s now a Version 2.0 in progress, including industry addendums, in beta testing.

The organization is also working with state governments on new forms of incorporating that better reflect the rise of triple bottom line for-profit companies. These new forms will try to encourage this new type of business through certain benefits similar to what only nonprofits have so far enjoyed. States with such alternative corporate forms permitted or in progress include CA, CO, NY, MN and VT.

I haven’t considered a certification program yet for a number of reasons, but will now be doing so. I’m launching a new company with a partner, in September, focused on strategic sustainability/CSR communications for small and mid-size enterprises that will help clients develop systemic sustainability programs (rather than piece meal) and better engage stakeholders through social media and other collaboration tools, among other services complimentary to SRB’s. This fits in well with a number of things on which B Corp and its certified companies and partners are working.

May 27th, 2009

Will We See a Federal Eco-Label Program Soon?

As green marketing has proliferated the last few years, so has the number of “eco-labels” competing to be the environmental or socially-responsible equivalent of a Good Housekeeping seal of approval. There are literally hundreds of labels with only a handful known by more than tiny percentage of consumers. And more are coming all the time.

This proliferation has lead to significant amounts of confusion, not only by consumers, but even those in the industries being certified.

We found one humorous example of this confusion. A label calling themselves “Tested Green Certification” states that they are, “endorsed by the National Green Business Association and the National Association of Government Contractors to provide green certification to federal and state contractors as well as other green small businesses.” This claim was then apparently taken out of context and was reclaimed by a supply chain services company who is one of their clients. On its website, the client asserted that it “has been certified by the TESTED GREEN Federal Government certification program” [italics added for emphasis].

While the federal government has organic standards, it has no others related to environmental claims of products or services. There isn’t even any specific regulation on green product claims generally, let alone eco labels other than “organic.”

Instead, there are just unenforceable Federal Trade Commission guidelines (more than 10 years old and in the process of being updated) and false advertising laws that cover broad areas and often put the burden on those they’re meant to protect to prove claims are misleading.

The confusion the numerous eco-labels bring makes it difficult for consumers to intelligently compare the differences in businesses’ numerous environmental or social claims. As a result there is some skepticism and distrust of such green claims and eco-labels.

Green businesses and their marketers, now realizing the problems of greenwashing, are looking for the most credible eco-labels. As Kevin Owsley, owner of Cleanpro USA LLC, of Scottsdale, Ariz., joked with the Wall Street Journal, “If you want green certification bad enough, you can get it… I could buy some of these companies a case of beer, and they’d give us a certification.”

In response to the confusion and misleading claims, Diane Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, had circulated late last year a draft bill that could eventually become a de facto federal mandate for eco-labeling. While she has distributed draft language to other Senate offices, only a leaked copy has provided any clues to the details. They include:

  • An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) voluntary program to award environmental impact approvals to consumer products.
  • Accurate, science-based criteria for green labels.
  • A 13-member decision-making board, chaired by an EPA official and with members from manufacturing, environmental, consumer, scientific and labor groups.
  • “Product certification centers” that would establish eco-label criteria for specific product categories and award green label status to products on the basis of their “potential to reduce negative environmental impacts.
  • Eligible products would be those that present “a significant potential to effect environmental improvements through consumer choice.”

Feinstein’s program is intended to recognize consumer products that are environmentally preferable over others throughout their life cycle. While the senate has been publicly quiet on their efforts, some believe the bill may be introduced this year.

Thanks to my intern, Tiffany Fox, for her research efforts on this piece. We’ll soon be putting out a white paper on eco labels to help guide businesses. Stay tuned!



RSS Subscribe to our Blog

Add to Technorati Favorites

Bookmark and Share

  • Blogroll

  • Archives

    Popular Tags

    Social Media