Perry Goldschein - Sustainability Strategy, Communications & Marketing

Sign Up For
Conscious Clicks

Our free monthly newsletter for news, analysis and marketing tips!



Yes, I want to receive Conscious Clicks
> Privacy Policy

CONSCIOUS CLICKS - The Blog

News and analysis on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and Internet and other digital marketing and communications. You'll even get some very practical tips on these topics that you can put to immediate use!

February 1st, 2012

Cultivate Your LinkedIn Network for Best Results

I was at a networking event last year in Manhattan for the Marketing Executives Networking Group, when I started speaking with a former CMO from a mid-size company sitting next to me.

We started talking about different ways he was going about exploring new opportunities, when he mentioned his use of LinkedIn.

To my surprise, he mentioned his disappointment with it.  He explained that he had over 200 people in his LinkedIn network to whom he had recently reached out, yet only one to two dozen or so had responded – a 10 percent response or less to people he knew with a simple request for help.

Then, I was even more surprised. I had just reached out to my whole LinkedIn network for the first time since it had gotten sizable (and first time in years).  My network was about three times larger than the CMO’s, and received over 200 responses, for roughly a 35 to 40 percent response rate. The response I had gotten had blown me away, but I figured it must be typical for personal networks.

I reached out again another couple of times to more or less my whole network over the last year and got similarly impressive, if smaller response rates.  The last time was in October.

There are a lot of factors that affect what percentage of your network would respond to a message you convey – all similar to email marketing generally. These include the message itself, its source, the frequency of messages received from the source and their relevance, the call to action, etc.

Perhaps the biggest though, is cultivation of your network.  This starts with who you connect with in the first place; and includes how you keep in touch and add value for each member.  I try to LinkIn only with people I’ve met or talked with on the phone – that represents over 95 percent of my LinkedIn network, with over half of those I’ve actually met in person. Then, over time, I provide general information to many, as well as specific information useful to one or a few individuals, along with truly personalized messages when appropriate and relevant.

When I do reach out with a request or call to action, I bake in mutual value with it – an exchange of ideas or other contacts, for example.  Thoughtful blog pieces on leading sustainability portals has also helped with credibility and recognition. Recently, I’ve been able to make a number of connections for people in my network that have led to strong opportunities — for new business in one case and a full-time position in another.  The grateful response from colleagues has been gratifying.

This approach has led to some new business for me over the years, a job offer I accepted, and dozens of new and high-quality executives, entrepreneurs, and other professionals joining my network. I’m sure this would work well for any organized networking – I have simply found LinkedIn to be the best tool for my purposes so far, even though there is still plenty of room for improvement.

I’m counting on my network coming through for me again as I prepare to reach out another time in the next several days.

January 30th, 2012

Values: from the Mouths & Pens of Babes…

Yesterday (Sunday) in the late afternoon I was “dusting off” old material I had worked on from a few years back around those of my personal values most important to me.  I wanted to hone my personal brand as I continue to consider new opportunities in a tough, highly-competitive environment.  I was also adding more recent stories that demonstrated these values and my unique experiences.

I sat at the kitchen nook table with pen and paper instead of computer to permit a more visceral aspect to the exercise; and to be with my family instead of in front of my PC computer screen in my home office.

As I started jotting down my deep thoughts around such things as beauty, discovery, communications, and creativity, my five-year-old daughter saw me writing.  Writing is currently a favorite activity of hers and she came over and asked what I was writing about.

I should have been, but wasn’t completely prepared for that – now how to explain about deep, personal values to a five year old?

Well, imagine how proud I was when I made my initial attempt – digging in for a long dialogue to help Eva better understand – and she got it right away!  She asked “like sharing and caring?” She started writing her own list of values, adding playing, eating, appreciating, and family to sharing and caring.

Our personal values can act as our North Star, helping us navigate not only our careers but our personal lives – two things which I believe should be integrated to the greatest extent possible.  How wonderful that the building blocks of this important concept can be understood by young children, even though so many “grown-ups” lose sight of this.

I look forward to continuing to encourage my daughter to keep track of her personal values along with me.

April 22nd, 2011

Climate Change Letter to WSJ Editor

A guest post from my friend, Jeff Dubin, sent to Wall Street Journal
_________________________________________

Dear Editor:

Like politicians engaging in “gotcha politics,” The Wall Street Journal is once again engaging in “gotcha climate science.”  The WSJ and other climate change skeptics are having a field day with the 2005 United Nations prediction of fifty million climate refugees by 2010 (“Climate Refugees, Not Found” editorial, April 21).  Climate change skeptics point to this report, the UK Climategate scandal, and other missteps by climate scientists as evidence that the so-called “climateers” are being unnecessarily alarmist.

Why can’t the Journal and other skeptics aim higher than just finding chinks in the climate change community’s armor?  The Journal and other skeptics would be far more persuasive if they presented their own body of solid science showing that climate change is not happening.  It’s easy to say “gotcha!” but that’s about all climate change skeptics can do when the facts are overwhelmingly not on their side.

If The Wall Street Journal wants to responsibly propagate a less alarmist view of our climate, it will have to be less disingenuous in the facts it cites.   For instance, the editorial is technically correct when it claims that “global average temperatures are about where they were when the prediction [of fifty million climate refugees] was made.”  But to imply that climate change is not happening because 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest years on record while ignoring the overall warming trend over the past several decades is a great example of scoring rhetorical points at the expense of honesty.

Jeff Dubin
Princeton, NJ

March 16th, 2011

4 Critical Q&As for Sustainability Branding

Sheila Viswanathan from GoodGuide made a nice blog post with four basic, yet critical questions for brands who have started down the path of greater sustainability. What follows is my answers to her questions in a comment on her blog post, which is pending approval as I post this.

The 1st Q: Do you think it’s better for brands to shout their sustainability from mountain tops, or just let products show for themselves?

My thoughts: First, brands engaged in substantive sustainability efforts should communicate about those efforts, at the very least to help educate consumers about relevant issues.

Second, such communications should be integrated and made a part of the brand so that they are authentic — that way, if a brand is known for shouting from mountain tops, shouting sustainability from those mountain tops will fit; if more reserved, likewise.  Starbucks, Timberland and Method are prime examples of brands doing this particularly well.

Third, brands increasingly need to find issues relevant to their industry and products where they can take a leadership position — this will be necessary to help them continue to use sustainability as a differentiator. Starbucks did this, for example, with its crowd sourcing “Betacup” campaign to help it find the best solution to those millions of unsustainable paper cups its coffee is served in every day.

The 2nd Q: If brands don’t “shout from mountaintops,” how will we know what good they’ve started to build into their operations?

My thoughts: we won’t know, unless we’re among those small few who go digging. However, each brand must determine how sustainability can best be integrated (see first part of my response to question above). I do think it will be beneficial to talk about it where possible for the vast majority of brands, as long as it’s in a credible and, yes, transparent way.

The 3rd Q: What about smaller brands that don’t have money to shout from mountaintops?

See the Gort Cloud by Richard Seireeni, which shows how smaller brands have been doing this even before social media. I’ve personally helped dozens of such brands with digital and other marketing tactics utilizing “NGOs, trendspotters, advocacy groups, social networks, business alliances, certifying organizations, and other members of the green community,” so I know Rich’s advice is sound.

The 4th Q:  What role do corporate sustainability reports play in all of this? Have you ever read one of these reports (or a summary of one)?

With sustainability / CSR reports becoming ever more common, they have a critical role in marketing communications beyond being a check box tactic. Smart companies are using their CSR reports as the strategic planning tools they are, and to have available for stakeholders that request them; but, critically, they’re breaking down the typically vast amounts of data and stories in their reports in digestible bits targeted to each stakeholder group. For the 90-some percent of consumers, employees, and investors who will never read a CSR report, this is very important. In most of these cases, this is done digitally/interactively.

March 10th, 2011

Funny, fun & games

Read an important reminder about the need for comedy and humor in helping forward messages around the serious topic of sustainability — especially when so much doom and gloom has traditionally been associated with it.

There certainly aren’t enough funny or fun campaigns around the topic. However, here’s one funny example of a big sustainability-oriented Audi campaign (a commercial from the Super Bowl before last).

Here’s another campaign from Volkswagen designed for fun.



RSS Subscribe to our Blog

Add to Technorati Favorites

Bookmark and Share

  • Blogroll

  • Archives

    Popular Tags

    Social Media